Industrial Social Robots (SOBOTS) to Enhance Smart Production Systems

Stelian Brad 1*

1 Technical University of Cluj-Napoca
Memorandumului Str., No. 4, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
* Corresponding author. E-mail: stelian.brad@staff.utcluj.ro

Robotica & Management, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 09-20
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24193/rm.2023.1.2

Abstract: This paper explores the potential use of social robots in smart manufacturing industries, presenting several use cases where such robots could bring benefits. The design considerations for developing social robots that can effectively operate in industrial production environments are also discussed, using the TRIZ methodology. Furthermore, the paper highlights the advantages of using social robots together with traditional robots in some use cases. The aim is to provide insights on how social robots can be designed and utilized to improve efficiency, safety, and worker satisfaction in smart industrial production systems.

Keywords: social robots, smart manufacturing, TRIZ, design considerations, implementation cases.

Full text

References

[1] United Robotics Group: “CobiotX, the 3rd Generation of Robotics: Robots for Humans”, https://cobiotx. unitedrobotics.group/en, accessed at: 04.03.23.

[2] Niculescu A.I., Banchs R.E., Li H.: ”Why Industrial Robots Should Become More Social”, In: Beetz, M., Johnston, B., Williams, MA. (eds) Social Robotics. ICSR 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8755. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11973-1_28, p. 276–278, 2014.

[3] Hostettler D., Mayer S., Hildebrand C.: ”Human-Like Movements of Industrial Robots Positively Impact Observer Perception”, Int J of Soc Robotics (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-022-00954-2, 2022.

[4] Zlotin B., Zusman A.: “Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ), Theory”, In: Carayannis, E.G. (eds) Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-319-15347-6_36, p. 1492–1506, 2020.

[5] Williams A.B., Williams R.M., Moore R.E., McFarlane M.: “AIDA: A Social Co-Robot to Uplift Workers with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities,” 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Daegu, Korea (South), doi: 10.1109/HRI.2019.8673272, p. 584-585, 2019.

[6] Sauppé A., Mutlu B.: “The Social Impact of a Robot Co-Worker in Industrial Settings”, p. 3613-3622. 10.1145/2702123.2702181, 2015.

[7] Vänni K.J., Korpela A.K.: “Role of Social Robotics in Supporting Employees and Advancing Productivity”, In: Tapus, A., André, E., Martin, JC., Ferland, F., Ammi, M. (eds) Social Robotics. ICSR 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9388. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_67, p. 674–683, 2015.

[8] Ilevbare I.: “Integration of TRIZ and Roadmapping for Innovation, Strategy and Problem Solving – TRIZ, Roadmapping and Proposed Integrations”, 10.13140/ RG.2.1.4694.1283, 2015.

[9] Childs P.: “Ideation”, In: Mechanical Design Engineering Handbook, 2nd ed., Elsevier, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/C2016-0-05252-X, p. 75-144, 2019.

[10] Adel A.: “Future of Industry 5.0 in Society: Human-Centric Solutions, Challenges and Prospective Research Areas”, J Cloud Comp 11, 40 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-022-00314-5, 2022.

[11] Ali N., Mohamed Isa, Z., Abu Bakar S., Ahmad Jali, F., Shaharruddin S.: “Industrial Revolution (IR) 4.0: Opportunities and Challenges in Online Business”. Proceedings 2022, 82, 85. https:// doi.org/10.3390/ proceedings2022082085, 2022.